Near the end of the movie Big, Josh Baskin the Elder presents an idea for, as described by one of the suits in the meeting, a “computerized comic book”. I saw the movie shortly after I turned 14. Even then, when computers and electronics were the awesomest of everything, I hated the idea of a computerized comic book.
For one, I was aghast at the price point Baskin was working with, just as the suits were. A retail of $24.99? For a comic book? And each new “issue” will run you $6.95? Yeeeah – I’ll pass. Baskin definitely hit a homerun with the building-that-turns-into-a-robot-that-turns-into-a-dinosaur, and I loved his ideas on the Squeegie Doll line, but he missed by a mile on this one.
Personally speaking, there’s no way I would choose a computerized comic book over the real thing. The feel of a brand-new comic right off the rack, the crazy ads for x-ray glasses and Grit and Sea-Monkeys, the option to polybag each one and save them for your grandkids, or a rainy day – for me, these things are irreplaceable. About a year ago, I bookmarked a site that catalogued every issue of The Amazing Spider-Man electronically.
For X dollars a month, you could read to your heart’s content. Knowing that the odds of me setting my hands on a Spider-Man #1 were non-existent, I thought this would be a great way to get to know all of the back issues I’d missed out on. I was wrong. I haven’t been back to that site because I have no interest. I decided that I’d rather read a real comic book about a Monchichi’s quest for a magical friendship bracelet than an electronic comic book.
I have the same feelings about eBooks, and until an army of evil technocrats is able to render real books extinct, I won’t invest in a Nook or a Kindle. One argument in favor of eBooks is that they’re more portable than an actual book. My answer to that is: do a few more bicep curls, and you should be fine.
Proponents of eBooks also cite that they’re better for the environment. I don’t have the up-to-date figures on global deforestation at hand, but in our quest to save trees, books are at the bottom of my list of things we should think about doing away with. I mean, we’re talking about books — with covers and pages and binding and smells and colors and a place on a bookshelf (the most underrated piece of furniture in any home), and getting to the point where we have enough books to form things called studies and libraries.
Books are fun to read. They’re nice to look at. They’re fun to collect. They’re fun to share. I don’t think they’re meant to be read on a rectangular computer screen and stored on a jump drive.
I’m not against technology – it’s made countless improvements to our quality of life. But how do you improve on a book? You can’t.
If you remember one thing from this post, remember this: anything read on a Nook or a Kindle isn’t a book – it’s a pdf.
A note from the other guy at WritingBold:
hi, here’s Tommaso speaking. I feel like adding a few words to what Brian said, because I see the matter from another point of view, the one of… a believer. Since I bought a Kindle
1) I read more
2) I buy more books, because it’s SO easy (my two most recent purchases include a biography of Tesla and Masters of Doom)
I agree that for some books the physical copy is still a must, and those I buy in the classic format, especially when there is some added value to the pure text (for example, they are good to look at, or made with high quality materials).
When it comes to comics I have mixed feelings: I like to skim the physical thing, but recently I bought a few issues of Saga in electronic format because there was no realistic way to get them where I live for a reasonable amount of money – or in a reasonable amount of time. Also, let’s face it, modern apartments are not made for dead-tree lovers. I’m already struggling enough with the amount of old newspapers and magazines piling in the corners.
I’m not sure I will ever reach a point where I wouldn’t buy anything on paper anymore, but you can be damn sure that I don’t miss at all the weight of a George R. R. Martin novel in my commuter bag.
4 comments
Trackback e pingback
No trackback or pingback available for this article











The argument about the portability is a valid one as soon as you do something else than practice your biceps in the comfort of your home. Kindle fits in the pocket of my jacket, which is pretty nice for bus rides. It also saves space in your luggage, if you’re an avid reader and like to read on your vacations.
I’ve still bought more physical than Kindle books even during the time I’ve had the ebook reader. However, since getting the Kindle I’ve bought books I never would have seen without it. Amazon likes to promote that damn thing, self-publishing authors seem to have the same idea, so there are lots of free and almost-free books available to try out. I don’t really see how that would be a bad thing.
I’m curious, does the music also need to be physical? And how physical would that be – is CD good enough or is vinyl required for authenticity?
Well, I have indeed just bought a new hifi system to enjoy in all its glory my collection of limited edition CDs, and complemented that with a vinyl player
(http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/s720x720/553384_10151294105356124_594917048_n.jpg).
But I have a certain fetish for music, and on my side I’m also an enthusiastic subscriber of Spotify, so I think there is space for every format as long as each one of them serve a different purpose. And I think you can agree that listening a vinyl is not like having Spotify running in the background. It’s a much more deliberate act of sitting down and “listening”.
- Tommaso
As a librarian, of course I can’t help but add my two cents here. I totally know what you mean about the “feel” of books and what goes along with them–I feel that way myself, but even before I became a convert to ebooks, I knew as a librarian, that I couldn’t bank on a format forever, even if it was one I was particularly attached to, because formats change—and (thankfully) for me and for everyone, libraries are more than just storehouses for books–we’re not just bricks and mortar, we provide a service as conduits for equal (and free) access to information and entertainment which can be provided in a variety of formats. The print comic may always be your first love, but if it’s any consolation, I do think that the e-comic has a lot of potential and will only get better over time. Nook is doing it wrong, in my mind, and I say that as an owner of a Nook. Overdrive is no friend of mine either and it’s places like them that are creating lose-lose situations with libraries and authors/artists alike, but there are places that are starting to spring up that have better philosophies and provide much more satisfying reader experiences.
These are great insights, Susan — thanks for sharing!
Brian